CCTU 16, turmoil, change…

I was driving, as one does, my iron horse and its drinking problem and then there was me. I hear on my radio, amongst the music of today, for better or worse, something that made me wonder. It appears, that Britney Spears has under an alias joined the myspace.com community looking for Mr. Right. There are issues raised here that I feel I have no choice but to question. Firstly of all by assuming an alias she’s essentially pretending to be someone she isn’t. So she is Britney Spears minus the music, money and whatever silicon modifications she has undergone. Essentially leaving you with a personality, and some pictures of another woman, possibly someone that isn’t too far fetched from what she really looks like. (I know when my alias’s picture is the Governator of California few there are few people gullible enough to believe my favourite pastimes include Counter-Strike comps and a few LANs) I guess what I am really trying to get at is that, hypothetically if someone were to meet Britney Spears on myspace.com would she really even be a nice person. It’s a pretty common ideology that celebrities are overly superficial. Without the qualities that the ‘world’ sees as desirable (and subsequently pressuring us into being bulimic) what kind of person are we left with? I am pretty sure I wouldn’t like her, but then you can never be sure. I am judging a book by its cover after all. The second point of interest lies in if she is pretending to be someone else on msypace.com. What then are the chances of her running into a creepy old man pretending to be someone else? Why is it that sometimes in life you have to lie to find the truth? Look I don’t know these things, stop pressuring me alright.

Jacinta, back in town, to stay, to settle down…
Interesting how some things never seem to change.
Alright, The blogosphere is has collapsed slightly as the blogibility of the above statements are currently being questioned by dungeon master part of my mind which is responsible for defining the rules of engagement to which I must conform. I think the infringement is something along the lines of making a specific reference to anything in particular. However, due to the general ambiguity of the statement and waffling on that occurred since said statement was made it has been approved and is allowed to remain here in the blogosphere. The rules of engagement remain unadulterated so I look forward to the next round of superficial encounters and generally pretending to be really vague. Normailty has been restored (well as normal as it gets)

Head the size of a planet and you want me to open doors?... Marvin is such a champ.

So we were talking about predestination and I was thinking about the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy and the wide spread use of time travel. It’s stated in the abovementioned book that time travel was discovered simultaneously in every time period. Due to the nature of time travel itself was able to be discovered in every time period simultaneously to word it another way. What really occurred to me is that Trillian is a reporter in an age where travelling through space and time is a pretty ordinary day to day occurrence. I mean in one way it allows you to get coverage of news stories that were previously a mystery, or so old that it’s become merely myth or legend. So on one hand you have the history channel. Then you can look ahead and get hot new trends and the latest stories by travelling into the future, but then I mean it’s it a bit of a spoiler. Like someone telling you the end of the movie, if I knew the ending I probably wouldn’t have bothered to see it. If I knew my platoon was going to get wiped out, I wouldn’t bother joining the army. This future prediction would affect potential cannon fodder in the present and subsequently without ground troops, the army may fail and the whole civilisation gets wiped out. “Just in: Due to the impact of our last story the future it again clouded, but don’t despair, Channel 10 News - “I can see clearly now”” Thirdly the ability to travel quickly around the universe will bring forth a third channel. You know the everyday local news, kind of like that but galaxy news for events happening right now (whenever that is). Then the galaxy is just so darn big, so there would be numerous 24hour channels dedicated to this stuff. Between watching millions of years behind me, millions of years ahead of me and what the inhabitants are up to in a million light year radius, there would be so much information that you would never be able to watch it all. I think that I would personally get so desensitized that I wouldn’t bother watching it anymore. Unless they could just beam it all in, but it’s also pointed out in the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy that by extrapolating data collected from a cupcake a module of the universe was created. The inventor then subjected his nagging wife (whom though playing with cupcakes was trivial) to all the information in the universe which turned her thoroughly mad, or killed her, I can’t remember which.

Bad luck comes in threes, three paragraphs, three topics, three cohesive ties, three ideologies, three main hypothesises, twice three points, three with, three against, three meanings perceived or no, it seems change comes in threes, it appears turmoil strikes thrice.